I Hold in My Hand the Names of 20 Catholic Colleges that Cover Contraception

In a scene reminiscent of anti-communist Congressman Joseph McCarthy holding in his hands a fraudulent list of names of communist spies in an effort to silence his political opposition, Rep. Elijah Cummings submitted a list of Catholic colleges in twenty states that already provide contraceptive coverage during a hearing on religious liberty yesterday.

In closing out his question and answer with The Catholic University of America President John Garvey, who said that Catholic colleges couldn’t violate their conscience by providing contraceptive coverage, Rep. Cummings countered by submitting into the record his list.

After repeated calls to Cummings’ office and the Committee of Government Oversight and Reform, The Cardinal Newman Society learned that Rep. Cummings obtained the list from the pro-abortion National Women’s Law Center.

The Cardinal Newman Society has obtained that list and looked into it to see whether it stood up to scrutiny.

It seems that many of the colleges on that list provide contraceptive coverage in states that mandate they do so. So, in short, the politicians in those states forced colleges to provide contraceptive coverage, and then the politicians on the federal level use the fact that they’re providing it as evidence that it’s okay for others to do the same.

It’s worth noting as well that many of the colleges on the list provide coverage for certain drugs that have therapeutic purposes apart from their contraceptive effects and are covered only when medically necessary for these other purposes—for conditions such as ovarian cysts, endometriosis, and acne—like the Franciscan University of Steubenville, the University of Dallas and the University of Notre Dame, among others.

Here’s the list of Catholic colleges that reportedly provide contraceptive coverage, according to the NWLC:

Santa Clara University, The Jesuit School of Theology, the University of San Diego, and San Francisco University all reportedly provide contraceptive coverage to their employees as mandated by the state of California.

Sacred Heart University in Connecticut also provides contraceptive coverage to employees in the state of Connecticut which mandates it.

Georgetown University does so although they are under no legal obligation to do so.

Dominican University in Illinois and Loyola University of Chicago cover contraceptives as mandated by state law.

The University of Notre Dame is included on the list as providing for “oral contraceptives” by the NWLC but only for “existing pathologies” and not for birth control.

Loyola University of New Orleans provides contraceptive care and is under no state mandate to do so.

Loyola University in Maryland provides coverage for non-contraceptive uses of certain drugs that are frequently prescribed as contraceptives.  Maryland mandates contraceptive coverage.

University of Detroit Mercy allows contraceptive coverage. Michigan mandates contraceptive coverage.

Saint John’s University of New York covers vasectomies and tubal ligations but not oral contraceptives.

Dayton University in Ohio provides contraceptive coverage and is not mandated to do so.

Franciscan University of Steubenville provides coverage for non-contraceptive uses of certain drugs that are frequently prescribed as contraceptives.

John Carroll University also provides coverage for non-contraceptive uses of certain drugs that are frequently prescribed as contraceptives.

Kings College and Scranton University of Pennsylvania provide coverage for non-contraceptive uses of certain drugs that are frequently prescribed as contraceptives.

University of Dallas also provides coverage for non-contraceptive uses of certain drugs that are frequently prescribed as contraceptives.

St. Edwards University in Texas provides contraceptive coverage. The NWLC was unable to ascertain any limitations on that coverage.

University of the Incarnate Word in Texas provides contraceptive coverage. They are under no state mandate to do so.

Saint Michael’s College in Vermont provides contraceptive coverage as is required by state mandate.

Gonzaga University provides contraceptive coverage but only when “medically necessary.” The state of Washington mandates insurance plans cover contraceptives.

Seattle University provides contraceptive coverage.

Marquette University and Viterbo University provide contraceptive coverage with few limitations. Wisconsin mandates coverage.

As you can see, while many of these Catholic colleges do provide coverage of some drugs that could be used for contraceptive purposes, many of them draw the line and exclude them for reasons of birth control. And some are mandated to provide coverage. Some, of course, like Georgetown, provide it of their own volition.

Other colleges like Fordham and DePaul also have acknowledged contraception coverage.

But should the actions of Georgetown and a few others act as a mandate to every other Catholic institution in the country?  Of course not. Georgetown should not be allowed to become the federally appointed new magisterium of the Catholic Church — which of course acknowledges differences with the true Magisterium..

Dayton University announced just this week that they plan to continue offering contraceptive coverage.

“Our Catholic identity is at the heart of our institution’s mission, but, in light of the importance of the health of our employees and the prevention of disease, we entered into these plans,” said Teri Rizvi, UD’s associate vice president for communications. “We are not changing our employee health care insurance coverage.”

It seems some Catholic institutions have been given a lot of leeway by the bishops in recent decades. That leeway is now being used as a weapon against the bishops to curb religious liberty.

The President of The Cardinal Newman Society Patrick Reilly was quoted in an interview with Reuters talking about exactly this:

“This really highlights the elephant in the room,” said Patrick J. Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society, which works with colleges to strengthen their Catholic identities. “It is absolutely a wake up call.”

That wake up call may begin what Reuters called a “crackdown” on wayward Catholic institutions. Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport acknowledged to reporters that, “I’m sure there’s going to be some discussion about that.”

But for Rep. Cummings to use that list as a cudgel to discredit the testimony of CUA President John Garvey is simply disingenuous.

Now, to be fair, the list must also make some Catholics wonder why this admirable fight for religious liberty didn’t take place years ago, when states began mandating contraceptive coverage. Shouldn’t many of these Catholic schools have battled against their state legislatures in the same way many colleges are battling the federal mandate now?

There’s the analogy of the frog in boiling water, and it seems that Catholics are wading in some pretty hot water right now as they prepare a strong defense of religious liberty. Let’s just hope it isn’t too late.

10 Comments

  1. Scott Stanton
    Posted February 17, 2012 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    All of this lying is starting to get really old…

  2. Rhoda Bruce
    Posted February 18, 2012 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Even if 20 Catholic universities do cover contraceptives, doesn’t mean that all Catholic organizations should be FORCED to do so. It only means that 20 Catholic universities need to be disciplined by our church authorities for going against the catechism.
    What may not be mentioned is that sometimes these contraceptives are not taken to prevent pregnancies, but as a medication to kill and prevent tumors. A Catholic doctor may refuse to prescribe a contraceptive, but the same MD may prescribe this same contraceptive to treat a known diagnosised problem. I would see nothing wrong with taking BCP’s if its to keep you healthy and preserve your reproductive future.
    What I’m trying to say, is that just because the university allows contraceptives, doesn’t mean they are not following the church teachings. I think you’d have to look at each case. My daughter and also my best friend both take contraceptives to avoid tumors, which visit them if they are not taking BCP’s. However, if I take them, I would be committing a sin.

  3. Posted February 18, 2012 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    I often think of my kid going to the local Catholic primary school next year and tell myself its a great community with great values so what’s the problem.
    Then I read a blog like this and remember that the Catholic church only understands liberty as its institutional expression. The liberty of its members or even of others outside it’s fold from its instructions has never been understood by the church.
    A timely reminder that going to a Catholic school means potentially leaving behind the entitlements of wider society.

  4. Patricia Walsh
    Posted February 19, 2012 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Bingo with “elephant in the room” observation.

  5. Bob
    Posted February 20, 2012 at 1:09 am | Permalink

    On the subject of contraception, it is a generally overlooked or ignored fact that ALL chemical/hormonal contraceptives act as abortifacients if ovulation takes place in spite of the pill. The only forms of contraception that do not sometimes act as abortifacients are barriers (i.e. condoms and diaphragms) and spermicides. Therefore, the “pill” cannot be morally justified as a means of birth control and its use for that purpose is seriously wrong.

  6. Joseph Haggarty
    Posted February 21, 2012 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    You can add Boston College to the list of “Catholic” colleges which covers sterilization and contraception (i.e., for contraceptive purposes). I am an employee of BC, and my wife just called Harvard Pilgrim, which administers BC’s health insurance–although BC is a self-insurer–to find out exactly what is the case. This is what the HP representative told her:
    1)The Pill–covered under “pharmaceuticals.” Requires co-pay.
    2)Sterilization (tubal ligation & vasectomy)–covered under “family planning.” Requires co-pay.
    3)Intrauterine Device–covered under “family planning.” Requires co-pay.

    4) HOWEVER, the “Morning-After Pill” is NOT covered.

    From a separate inquiry, I know that (surgical) abortion is NOT covered.

    I do not know whether 1) – 3) are provided per Massachusetts law or whether BC does this voluntarily. This question may be complicated by the fact that BC is a self-insurer. If you know the answer and can direct me to the relevant laws, policy documents, etc., I’d appreciate it.

  7. Joseph Haggarty
    Posted February 21, 2012 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    I’ve found an answer to my question (above). Boston College DOES provide coverage of sterilization and contraception VOLUNTARILY. Although Massachusetts law does mandate such coverage, Boston College is exempt from the mandate because it is a self-insured institution; a federal law called ERISA exempts self-insurers from having to cover this (and a great many other) mandated benefits.

    Sources:
    1)”ThinkProgress,” a leftist blog (2/7/12):
    http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/02/07/420114/many-catholic-universities-hospitals-already-offer-contraception-as-part-of-their-health-insurance-plans/

    2) Boston Globe (2/7/12):
    http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-07/lifestyle/31034795_1_contraceptive-coverage-outpatient-contraceptive-services-health-insurance/3

    3) An official document on the state of Massachusetts website (mass.gov): http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dhcfp/r/pubs/mandates/comp-rev-mand-benefits.pdf
    (For this last one, see the bottom of page 7 of the text.)

  8. Mouse
    Posted February 25, 2012 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    But there is a real problem here, and we’re going to pay for it now: our compromises with evil on the state level have laid a foundation for the bold attacks we are now seeing at the state level. This is the dirty little secret no one wanted to admit to… In fact, we should never have complied with any of these mandates at the state level.

    STILL, the fact that some or even many are not faithful, does not give the government the right to mandate that all be unfaithful!!

  9. Mouse
    Posted February 25, 2012 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, I mean to say: our compromises at the state level have laid a foundation for bold attacks at the federal level…

  10. Mouse
    Posted February 25, 2012 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    And every one of these state mandates should be rejected as unconstitutional as well. Period. And we should be just willing to protest and even suffer persecution in resisting evil based on state mandates, as we are based on federal mandates. The unborn child under threat from these evil products doesn’t care who the evil law came from…

5 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Related to this is the blog at the same site, on “I Hold in My Hand the Names of 20th Catholic Colleges That Cover Contraceptives” (allegedly). [...]

  2. [...] the Cardinal Newman Society: I Hold in My Hand the Names of 20 Catholic Colleges that [...]

  3. [...] I found the following from the Cardinal Newman Society regarding the Congressional hearing yesterday on religious liberty.  Democratic Representative [...]

  4. [...] Congressional record by Rep. Elijah Cummings on February 16, 2012. Our original post can be found here.  At least one news organization has corrected its website, for which we are most grateful.   [...]

  5. [...] on Contraception MandateHomeschooling org. protests Obama plan to mandate school attendanceI Hold in My Hand the Names of 20 Catholic Colleges that Cover ContraceptionLeni Riefenstahl: Congratulations on the HHS RegulationsMandate a cure in search of a diseaseMandate [...]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 542 other followers